Is the Ford e150 the ultimate truck? (Our Review in Columbus)

I would certainly add Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the top three but with those domestics you certainly have my top four of perpetuity for dependability. Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never had an engine problem. Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel.

I ask yourself how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's very own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do every little thing I need this truck to do patgizz composed: 3 points in the automotive world refuse to damage.

those must be held as the criteria to which everything else is determined. Practically every little thing else fades in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, because of the outpour of appreciation, it looked good so I bought it, right here's the ad lmk what you individuals think Oops, didn't mean to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.

Is the Ford F150 the ultimate car?

initially order of biz though, I'm fairly huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly narrow ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I have actually ever before seen with trucks like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little as well hard and they would snap right at the floorboard.

Maintain in mind the gas mileage will not be the ideal in the world, however it will certainly damn sure run for life. Never ever had an engine concern.

When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just seemed like a diesel. I question exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time getting out of it's very own means ... The engine bay had not been made for anything longer than a Mod motor. One CAN get rid of an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, however it sucks.

"They are usually reputable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones created: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck.

Is the Ford e150 the best car? (Our Review in Columbus)

Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just appeared like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...

Really really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't explain ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point due to the fact that when I had to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go via each in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that had not been sludged up really terribly.

Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to chat about a couple of problems of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and claim one is better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same automobile.

They seem to be a little bit a lot more utilized because location, yet, you understand, those are a few of the uses, yet they're basically the exact same category of automobile. Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these 2 vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's discuss engine and actually just to define that the model years, we're going to begin with 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a long period of time.

Is the Ford F150 the ultimate car? (Our Review in Columbus)

And, you recognize, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you understand, around that time as well. Because 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.

There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have sufficient threading in the stimulate plug, which created issues.

Really very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point because when I needed to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to discover one that had not been sludged up truly terribly.

Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're mosting likely to speak about a couple of concerns of these vans, but I I'm clearly not going to appear and say one is far better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are several of the distinctions between these 2 brands? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same vehicle.

Is the Ford e150 the top truck? (Our Review in Columbus)

They seem to be a bit more made use of because area, however, you know, those are a few of the usages, however they're basically the very same category of vehicle. Mark: So, well, let's start with engines then. What issues do you see in between these two vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. Let's speak concerning engine and actually simply to specify that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I mean, these vans have actually been around for a long time.

And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has been around considering that, you know, around that time also. Given that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.

So, you know, Fords, and the majority of them come with the Triton V8. There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with blow to these engines, because they really did not have enough threading in the ignition system, which created issues. And often that would happen when you could be in a 15 passenger bus rising a hill with a tons of people and all of a sudden boom, a spark plug bulges and you're stranded.